Sister Marriage Invitation Wording In Tamil

An interesting discussion .... Ll

link This is a discussion that I opened on the site Luogocomune.net that is the existence of time.

I provide some interesting ...

How Much Do The Vaccination For Dog Cost

Time is our consciousness

The address of the photons, Time, Consciousness, I found online this interesting article.

In particular I wish to use this track:

"Actually, the ultimate light Itself moves with velocity whence ITS name. The waves of radiation, the photons, have no rest mass, only energy (and a kinetic mass appropriate to the energy). Therefore, time inside a photon stands still—at exactly the velocity of light the foreshortening is absolute. When measured by their "internal time" (if such a notion is permissible), the photons can traverse the entire Universe in an instant of their own time, although in our measure the time between the emission of a photon and its absorption by a body somewhere on the outskirts of the Universe would amount to thousands of millions of years or to anything short of infinity.
The analogy of the timeless photon could suggest possibilities for grasping (not solving) the greatest mystery of our experience — that of our consciousness, or our "soul". Its nature is not accessible to physical experiment, it is not subject to the laws of physics, to measurements or timing: it is immaterial. Being immaterial and massless, it could be timeless as the photon, moving with the speed of light in an instant (by its own timing) through the immensities of space. As a mere suggestion for an insoluble mystery — could it be that the immortal soul, the individual unit of consciousness, would move through the infinities of space and time, after leaving one body, to find another and cooperate with it, like the absorbed photon transmitting its energy when absorbed? We do not know; the nature of consciousness, of the soul remains the ultimate mystery, despite the fact that consciousness to us is the only incontestable reality, through Which We Perceive the world around us. "

Which translated reads:

" Currently, the light moves with the speed by which his name (the speed of light ndt). The wave radiation, photons have no mass, only energy (mass and kinetic energy appropriate). Dacian follows that the time of the photon stops - at the exact speed of light reduction is absolute. If measured by their own time (if that term is allowed) photons can traverse the universe in a moment of their own time even if our measurements with the passage of time from the issuance of the photon and its absorption by a body can get thousands of million years or something close to infinity. The analogy of the photon
timeless may suggest the possibility to address (not solve) the greatest mystery of our existence, that of our consciousness or our "soul." Its nature is not accessible to physical experiments, is not subject to the laws of physics, from measurements or temporalization. Being immaterial and massless, can be timeless as a photon moving at the speed of light in an instant (in his own time) are trough the immensity of space. For mere suggestion of a miestero insoluble - can it be that the immortal soul, unity and beauty INDIVIDUALLY consciousness, can move into the infinite of space and time after leaving a body, to find another and cooperate with it, as the photons are absorbed by transmitting its energy? We do not know, the nature of consciousness, the soul remains the ultimate mystery, despite the fact that consciousness is an undeniable reality for us through which we perceive the world around us. "

But here is the biography author of the article Ernst Julius Öpik .

I think there are some interesting connections between the concept of light and consciousness to
.... First it is interesting to note that a number of terms related to the concept of consciousness, of life, have consciousness as the light source or root word, eg the concept of enlightenment in the Buddhist religion, which refers to a state of consciousness that goes beyond the concepts of space, time and reality as we know it, or the fact that God has always been identified and "Good" in the light, as opposed to "evil" and darkness.

In Bhagavad Gita we read:

"Light of all lights, beyond the darkness; knowledge itself, what needs to be known, the goal of all knowledge, He dwells in hearts of all.

In the Gospel of John reads:

In the beginning was the Word,
the Word was with God and the Word was God

He was in the beginning with God
all things were made through Him, and without
him nothing was made of all that exists
.

In him was life and the life was the light of men
the light shines in the darkness,
but the darkness did not comprehend it.

He came as a witness to testify to the light,
that all might believe through him.
He was not the light,
but came to bear witness to the light.

came into the world the true light that enlightens every man
.

To return to our everyday expressions there are also references to light when one dies it is said that "turns off", as if our life was a light that illuminates the darkness of nothingness . When a child is born it is said that her mother "gave birth to a son." When you want a better understanding of what we ask for "clarification" or "lights" ....

There seems to be a deep connection between light and life, light and consciousness, light and eternity, between light and divine .... are aspects that should be explored, especially in light of the above in the same article above ....

How fast travel a thought?

I think it's an important question ....

How fast traveling our thinking?

We are our consciousness? Or our crosses be?

Why Do Shoes Pull Socks Down?

The Keepers of Time among the best sellers of the week on Lulu ..... A

.... and also best sellers of the month!

thanks to all those who are buying my book ....

Most 'sold the week

1	A history of CARLO ORIGGIO
2	THE DRAGON, THE SUN AND THE PANTHER of Gaia Vineyard
3	Juventus fan of self-defense manual - Volume 1 of Emilio Cambiaghi
4	Mauritius , Telecom, the Wind, the Privacy e. .. of Maurizio Schiarini
5	The Giro di Joomla in 80 tutorial! of Roberto Chimenti
6	Faces Palio of Gianmaria Zanotti
7	The Keepers of Time of stefano Civolani
8	Everything for a gesture of Matteo Cassina
9	Many small P of Marco Sette
10	Clipboard Real Estate Wealth Management of Ezio Bruna Most ' sold in the month 14 Guide to Investing in Brazil John 15 Promoting your book online of Stefano Calicchio 16 The man who turned the head of the puma Julian Musumeci Greek 17 The Keepers of Time of stefano Civolani

Crockery Purchased From Habitat 20 Years Ago

relativity too narrow?

We begin to make sense of the name of this blog.
I will try to highlight some concerns that arise from the conception of time as postulated by Einstein's special relativity. very brief summary: For Einstein's speed increases time slows down and space contracts with respect to a given reference system. Some perceive the slowing of time, however, the observer from another frame of reference the object (or person) that is increasing the speed, for those who in fact is accelerating time flows smoothly without slowing down. What happens to speed of light (which Einstein stands as an absolute limit of speed reached)? do not know ..... Really, is unknown. And this basically because the mathematical formulas that are used to measure the time dilation and contraction of space in the relativistic sense ( the Lorentz transformations), the speed of light must be broken down .... We know that mathematics is in front of his puzzles each time a result is zero or infinity. Well in this case the speed of light, to determine what happens to the photon (the particle that constitutes the light) by applying the Lorentz transformations we find ourselves with the zero as denominator .... The mathematical meaning of the transformation is (for a period of misuse of Godel incompleteness theorem) undecidable. My question is simple:

in the theory of relativity says that the speed increases time, that we keep in the frame that is accelerating with respect to us, slows down until it = 0 in the hypothetical case in which that object was moving at the speed of light . The propose this thought experiment: imagine to observe a photon to observe and imagine a hypothetical clock of the photon. The photon in a vacuum, since light travels at speeds definition = c. This means that I, looking at the clock of the photon, I see it still. The time photon to me that the watch does not exist, is = to zero photon that is eternal. First question: is the same for the photon? That is, if the photon look at his watch it would look or move normally the observers at rest? Second question: But to me that if I observe that the photon has no time, how is it that I can observed following the events of my first observation that involving photon? Let me explain how it is possible for something that did not have time to say that my observation that after the photon hit the surface of such a mirror and it will reflection? If I observe that his time is = to zero, to me that a photon has no "after" should ever be where I have observed the first time, because for me that I look is timeless and therefore can not participate in any future event: for him the future does not exist, there after, where I shall be eternally watch ... .. In other words, there can be movement in space without the time?

I asked this question a number of professors of physics I want to quote a famous professor from whom I do not have permission to disclose the particulars which I kindly replied as follows:

"A ray of light is not 'can be given the prerogatives of a observer and therefore does not make sense love him assign a tool measure as a clock. If you try to do this', even in a experiment, we run into situations that do not have paradoxical explanations. A ray of light can 'only be viewed but not' definable, even mathematically, what a ray of light would look. Since it is not 'defines a time measured by a beam of light, the phrase "a photon has no time" must be understood better as "not' define a proper time of the photon 'and this' course back to the previous answer ie 'that there is no clock in solidarity with a beam of light. Indeed it makes no sense not to say that intervals of time for a photon are all equal to zero because 'the zero' a number and this 'would mean a measure that a photon can not but' do. Obviously the phrase "the time of a photon and 'zero' is to be understood as " read the clock time intervals of a body subject to observation, they tend to zero when the velocity 'of the body tends to that of light than one who does the measure ". So property 'of the photon can not read their own time and' inferred as the limit of physical measurements. However, a ray of light or can also be observed as such by an observer who obviously moving at speed ' child and to which and 'associate a physical clock. To this observer the photon ' like any other object that moves over it, and then has an energy, a quantity' of motion and so characterizes it. The observations made for the measures also apply to time and space requirements. When we talk about movement in space means than a few observers who measure the distance traveled by a body, for example just one photon at a given time interval. But space and time are measured by an observer who is not 'the photon. In the case of light the confusion arises when unconsciously want to transfer to the photon prerogatives that are typical of our daily way of thinking. We tend to give the photon a future that is instead ' our future: the photon, like any other body, it moves in our future and it' what 'that we measure. "

E 'was also asked a similar question to this website NASA and the response was as follows:

" For a photon, or Any Other Essentially particle traveling at the speed of light, Could Be Any arbitrarily long distance traversed in less than a second....but eternity is different. For you to get boosted to a speed where 'eternity would pass in an instant' you would travel essentially an infinite distance, and the energy you would need to accelerate you would be infinite as well. For a photon, it is a completely meaningless exercise to ask how fast time passes for a photon, and in some sense in the 'rest frame' of such a massless particle, time is meaningless."

Per chi è digiuno di inglese la traduzione è la seguente:

"Per un fotone, o qualsiasi altra particella che viaggi essenzialmente alla velocità della luce, qualsiasi distanza arbitrariamente extended may be crossed in less than a second, but eternity is different. In order for you to be accelerated at a rate that "steps eternity in an instant" You travel an infinite distance and the energy that should be expected to accelerate esssere also infinite. For a photon is a completely meaningless exercise ask how fast time goes by a photon, and in a sense, at all times property of the massless particle, time is meaningless, "

One who gave this response works at NASA and its curriculum is this.

A couple of observations: we are told that a photon can theoretically take an infinite distance in less than a second (but if time is zero should perhaps say instantly) , the photon would be virtually simultaneously at the beginning and end of its hypothetical path (note that we are dealing with an infinite ...); also said that there is time for a photon is meaningless and that it can not be defined mathematically. Apart from that, as I was writing, the Lorentz transformations do not the doctor ordered us to this point: our photon would travel an infinite space in a time zero, in practice our photon would instantly at any point of its trajectory. Not that I perceive the passing of the time the photon is in every point of his career. So it does not travel farther at speeds of c (the speed of light) but it would have infinite velocity in the same way: it is inpossibile take an infinite space with a finite speed (as high ..) .

Beyond the paradoxes which I have just indicated, if such things are possible, at least on paper, that there are photons that have photographed events surrounding the beginning of the universe (and indeed we see the light death of stars thousands of light years ...) and that they continue to wander the universe forever.
However, the math does not allow us to understand this limiting case the theory of relativity, but this is not an insignificant unless it is a problem of language: I do not have the time to define and describe a time zero and an infinite path in an instant, however, that the photon should not exist as a T equal to zero. But we go beyond.
According to the theory of relativity in fact, two observers moving relative to each other they come to coincide in one point at a certain time (for example, a stationary observer in a railway station and an observer moving on a train passing through the station) are to have riferienti different time according to the Lorentz transformations.
So contemporary events and therefore exist for the stationary observer may well be past or future for the observer in motion and then to prove that no longer exist or do not exist. Are contemporary, the moment of coincidence, only the events that occur in the plane perpendicular to the direction of the train.

There is therefore a concept of relativity of existence in the sense that what exists for an observer may not exist or have existed already in motion for another compared to him.

is the loss of a conception of objective existence.
The only way to reconstruct a concept of existence if it covers every now be moving with respect to each of us is to think that every event in the past, present and future exist together, simultaneously.
This concept is explained by this masterfully written Fantappiè Italian mathematician Luigi. (Here is the biography of Fantappiè ).

relativity leads us to the conclusion that all events past, present and future as coexisting at any time.

But the strangeness of relativity are not over:
I think anyone who knows the famous formula E = mc ^2.

Well, maybe someone will wonder what I am 'writing, even if doing local mind to how to solve quadratic equations of the surprise should disappear;
Einstein's formula is a case of a particular formula for the first time published in 1890 by Oliver Heaviside and perfected later by Henri Poincare and Olinto de Pretto.
The original formula called energy equation (E)-time (p) - mass (m) was as follows:
E ² p = 2 c ² + m 2 c ⁴

This equation, like all those on appeal, has two solutions, one positive (+ E) and negative (-E).

"Of course" the negative (-E) was considered a mathematical trick and was not taken into consideration: indeed, it would imply that causes items in the future (it reverses the sign of the energy and that time) in this act. Einstein obvious to what the formula only to systems in which the inertial moment (p) is equal to zero. This door
E 2 = 0 + m 2 c ⁴
that is resolved as a simple equation of the first degree, or with the famous E = mc ²

formula Einstein found himself in trouble again when Wolfgang Pauli discovered the spin associated with the spin of electrons, the spin corresponds to a speed inherent in the constituents themselves matter and therefore time (P) could not be more clear .... You return alladoppia solution and negative energy. Where is our

-E?

A possible solution could be this .....

It 's interesting to note that in modern physics, however, there are other phenomena that include the reversal of the temporal coordinates. For each existing particle Dirac discovered the existence of an 'antiparticle (antimatter) and Feynmann said that, since the wave functions of electron energy for the product always appears if the time, when I consider enrgie and negative sign change even at the time, everything remains as before. In short, an electron propagates over time can be interpreted as a positron (its antiparticle) which propagates back in time.

What happens then to a photon?
What about the negative energy?
How does it affect our reality that past, present and future seem to coexist at all times?

are not trivial questions and I hope in the coming days to explain why .....

To Get Pearls In Aquarium

Ten years ago .......... Presentations

died on 29 May 1997, drowned in the Wolf River, Jeffrey Scott Buckley. His talent, his music, his voice is incredible tattooed in my mind and have not given up more. For those not familiar
recommend buying (yes I said buy, certain things are worthy purchase) Grace, his first (and essentially only) disc. I am convinced that, as has happened to me, you will be enchanted .......


This memory, from the book "The Guardians of Time," is dedicated to him ...

May 29, 1997 Memphis

The moon shatters into crystals of silver liquid in a thousand reflections, pale beam, turning the water of the river in a crinkled silk carpet. He looked again at the sky. Cruel Stars stared at his eyes, penetrate the heart, illuminating thoughts. A sad melody across his mind, the cul lando like leaves scattered on the waves of the River. He left the guitar on the stones of the shore and walked toward the water. I want to whole lotta love ... I want to whole lotta love the voice repeated shrieks of stereo. Led Zeppelin. Jeff stopped, as captured by a thought. She turned, smiled at Keith and plunged into the River. I joined the wet clothes to the skin making him shudder. To warm up your pace and started running. When the earth under their feet failed him he sank and darkness enveloped him. Feared, and emerged gasping. I want to whole lotta love. The music came to him, fragments of sound that comes together in his mind. He began to sing. I want to whole lotta love. He immersed himself again. Dark, then suddenly, a light in the darkness, a thrill. Surfaced to breathe. I want to whole lotta love. It plunged. The silence revives the thread of his thoughts. He must do better, could do better. Tomorrow would come the boys with them would be able to play that tune, to sing those words. Even that light. And a deafening hiss, a scream. Emerged. It was now far from the shore, soaking wet clothes, heavy shoes. The music was covered by the roar of the current. The Wolf River was howling around him. In music that he heard a roar, a melody I knew who had tried to preserve in his heart. It was like a reminder: the song of the sirens. His lips whispered a name, while the roar all around seemed to be the background of those words. ... Browse by me, sail to me, hug left *. Be embraced, let go drifting like a leaf at the mercy of the waves, free, finally free, no direction, no goal. He saw the pillars of the bridge. Navigate to me, sail to me. Arrival, he thought. He swam towards the bridge, reached out and grabbed the gray concrete. A distant call. It was Keith. Lando was ur 's something. She listened. A rumble seemed near, increasingly, more and more ... He turned. The shade of a boat licked the pillar. A moment of eerie silence, then a wave swept him, suddenly. She held her breath. Underwater Black tried to re-emerge, but the current dragged him down. ... And I could not wake from the nightmare that sucked me and drags me down ** ... Her voice screamed in his mind. Panico. The shoes were full of water among the boulders that nailed the pitch black walls. It was the end. Tossed lost orientation. Where the bottom? Where high? Suddenly everything was silent, the current subsided. Exhausted he heard her voice calling his name, closed eyes, he sent an invisible kiss. I am not afraid. I'm ready . .. and I feel them drown my name so easy to remember and to forget with a kiss, I'm not afraid to leave, but is so slow *** ... Let me sleep now ... Ah, the calm beneath that wild river poisonous **** ... Her voice enveloped him and rocked him to the bank. Hide a leaf in his hands.

The wolf had sunk its fangs on him, the leaf had sailed, his mind was clear out, finally. Voices of angels, mermaids songs, melodies of the heart, a thought, a prayer, the highest ever heard. Un sussurro di vento su un petalo di rosa.

_________

*… Sail to me, sail to me, Let me enfold you… (da Song to the siren – Tim Bucley)

**… And I couldn’t awake from the nightmare that sucked me in and pull me under, pull me under… (da So real – Jeff Buckley)

***… and I feel them drown my name so easy to know and forget with this kiss I'm not afraid to go but it goes so slow… (da Grace - Jeff Buckley)

**** ... Ah, That calm below ... That poisoned river wild (from You & I - Jeff Buckley)

Bloons Pack 3 Walkthrough

Hello Everyone,
I decided to open this blog to try to address in a calm, serene and depth of a series of topics that are particularly close to my heart: literature, philosophy, physics, music, poetry, religion ....

Why this blog is called the keepers of time? The reasons are basically three:
1) I believe that the time, at least as we were taught to perceive and think, both the resource scarce and unavailable man has available to it, does not know its duration, does not know boundaries, they feel the flow and the slow decline towards something that we call an end to that remains ineffable and elusive, we are no longer the guardians of our time, we have delegated to others, the routine duties, to the frenetic, watches the task of scanning this slow countdown that does not even know the number where we started ... We must return to be guardians of our time, to dominate and not be dominated, to hear us and let us n0n to wrest from a procedure that grinds hours as if they had available in abundance .... This site aims to be a guardian of time not trivial, not rhetorical where the time spent here is not lost ... and guadaganto

2) I am deeply convinced that as long as we perceive is an illusion, I am convinced that the concept of eternity belongs to us not just metaphorically but that our every moment, every thought is eternal ...

3) The Guardians of Time is the title of the book I just finished writing and handling of the arguments that I intend to deepen ...





Greetings to all

Gandalf